Paley, expresses that when we look at life and the universe it is logical to conclude that there is a designer because of how designed our universe and life is.
This cosmological argument is an argument that proves Gods existence from the existence of the world and universe because the existence of a universe stands in need of an explanation.
In his argument, he says things move (his definition of moving is a change of any kind, things are not stagnate. There are variations in temperature; there is life and earth. Etc.) But things do not move (change) on their own will or by their selves. Simply put, things that are moving or are in motion cannot logically be brought into motion by themselves but must be caused to move.
This argument shows how a moral lawgiver must exist for objective morals, because with out one all morals are subjective. It is necessary to say that those who don’t believe in a “Moral Law Giver” cannot not be moral; it is to say they have no objective reason to be moral and that their definition of “good moral behavior” is culturally or individually subjective not objectively true
In this worldview, it provides an anchoring for morality and an authority behind it to follow it. Our God, who has revealed His moral nature and will for our lives through scripture and through Jesus Christ. Good flows from Gods nature.
The Moral Relativist, in essence, gives the authority of coming up with a moral law to society, subjugating himself to the framework to imperfect people.
The world has examples and consequences of this in the Nazi Regime of Hitler or Russia’s Example of Stalin.