Coal would not be a good source of the future. For 1, it is nonrenewable. There for we will eventually run out of it anyways. Also, Coal ruins the ecosystem and emits greenhouse gasses. In all coal just would not be a good source for our future.
Oil would not be a good source for the future. First, it is nonrenewable. So even if it was a good source we would eventually run out of it. Also, oil is actually very bad for the environment. In fact oil is actually ruining our environment.
Natural Gas would not be a good resource for the future. It pollutes the air and is non renewable. Like many resources it is nonrenewable so even if it was a good resource for the future we would still eventually run out. Besides Natural Gas pollutes the air. Why would you want to use a resource that is bad for the economy?
Like many resources Nuclear Energy is Nonrenewable. Radioactive waste is permitted in Nuclear energy. Therefore Nuclear Energy will not be a good source for our future.
Wind Energy would be a good source of the future. For one, it is a renewable resource. We will never run out of wind. Also, wind energy does not pollute the air. The creation of wind is clean. Yes it may be costly but, it is worth it.
Although Hydroelectricity is costly, it would be an excellent source of the future. We would never run out of it because it is renewable, and could be rapidly replenished. Also Hydroelectricity is much safer than other resources. There is no fuel involved in the making of Hydroelectricity (other than water) making it much safer.
Geothermal energy would be a good source of the future. Most importantly it is renewable. We would be able to restore it quickly. A huge reason why it would not be a good source for the future is, because of the high construction costs. It would cost a lot of money to construct it but in the end, Geothermal Energy would be an excellent future source.
Solar energy although a renewable resource would not be a good future source. Yes it is free and Yes it does not pollute the air, but we would not be able to use it all the time. If it were a cold rainy day for example, solar energy would not be a good resource. Or if you lived in a small area solar energy would not be useful to you.
Biomass is a renewable resource, but it would not be a good source for the future. It is expensive for 1. We would have to spend lots of money just to keep replenishing this resource. Plus, it harms the environment. Although there are no harmful emissions biomass still harms the environment. Therefore it would not be a good future resource.
Ethanol would be a good future source. It is renewable and biodegradable. Not only can it be replaced but it can be decomposed by other living things. There are only a couple small disadvantages to having Ethanol as a future resource. Water absorption is a main one but water is renewable so it is not a big deal. Ethanol would be a great source for the future
Biodiesl would not be good future resource. There will be future rises in prices. As time passes prices will be increasing. Plus there is a high cost of production. Meaning it will cost a lot to use biodiesl.
Electric cars would be a great source for the future. They are renewable. Electric cars are easily replaceable. Also to charge the car costs less than gasoline. On the negative side, electricity is not free. It will still cost you money to charge your car, but not as much as it would to fill your tank of gas.
While hydrogen fuel cells are a renewable resource they would not be a good source for the future. They are expensive. It will cost you a lot of money. Also hydrogen fuel cells have a short range. All in all, it would not be a good resource to have hydrogen fuel cells in the future.