The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2008) released a fact sheet about driving and talking
on a cell phone. It found that 6% of drivers used cell phones while driving in 2007, which translates to
1,005,000 vehicles during any given day (p. 1). At this point, a writer has a choice to make: either use the
statistic or use the number that the statistic represents. An author who uses the statistic of 6% may
convince an audience that the number of drivers who use cell phones while driving is low, whereas an
author who uses the number of 1,005,000 may convince an audience that the number is high. Each
number represents the same idea differently.
For example, consider the practice of Supreme
Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. who often engaged in playful sparring with his law clerks (Ramage,
2006). “Holmes would enter the office each day and demand of them that they ‘State any proposition and I’ll
deny it!’” (Ramage, 2006, p. 26). In asking such a question, Holmes was enlarging his own capacity to see
various sides of an issue clearly and taking part in a “rhetorical conversation,” thus enabling him to “be in a
position to make the best—most appropriate, most defensible—choice” (Ramage, 2006, p. 28) in the
decisions he would have to make as a judge on the nation’s highest court.