HUNTING-GATHERING

HUNTING AND GATHERING HAS NO POLLUTION

• "The meal was fully paid for in every sense,
• there was no pollution or packaging left over."
• "No chemicals are being used that can hurt the soil."
• unlike industrial organic food.

hunting and gathering food does not contain chemicals.

•  "There is no antibiotics put into the animals or plants 
• that you collect."
• "The industrial food chain has a lot of chemicals that 
• can very well kill you."

COUNTERCLAIM

• Some may say that my foragers meal is
• unrealistic, but i would answer the fast food meal 
• as unrealistic also.
•  The industrial food chain costs each and everyone 
• in government spending.

Why should we care

• Wouldn't you want to be able to live longer and be healthier.
• If you chose my foragers meal you will be able to do these things.
• You would also have more money to spend on other things.

conclusion

• Hunting and Gathering is the best way to
• feed our country. Because it is healthier
• and much cheaper in the long run.

citations

• Pollan, Michael. The omnivore's dilemma: a natural history of four meals. New York: Penguin Press, 2006. Print.