PRESENTATION OUTLINE
How journalists think about statistics
(and how they don't)
Regina Nuzzo, Ph.D.
Professor, Gallaudet University
Freelance Science Writer
June 12, 2018
AP Statistics Reading
Kansas City, Missouri
Hearing ≠ Listening
Telling ≠ Commu-nicating
“Explainability Strategist”
“Algorithmic Forensic Analyst”
JOURNALISTS
find the story amidst
the facts.
STATISTICIANS
find the signal amidst the noise.
JOURNALISTS:
"If your grandmother says she loves you, check it out anyway."
STATISTICIANS:
"What's the strength of evidence that Granny loves you?"
“Amid Statistical Illiteracy, 62% of Colleges See a Rise or No Change in Applicants”
P-hacking & Story-hacking:
Confirmation bias
Motivated cognition
Combat these with:
Teach about cognitive biases;
Instill a healthy fear of being called out.
"STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE IS SIGNIFICANT."
P-Dazzled and Ignoring
Effect Size:
Assuming p Failing to connect results to the real world
Combat with:
Less p-value worship;
The oh-come-on “story behind the story”
“WARNING: DON’T TOUCH THE NUMBERS”
Avoidance of touching the numbers:
Fear of numbers;
Fear of going “off script”
How to combat:
Teach the power of descriptive statistics and data manipulation;
Less emphasis on one right answer;
Encourage playing around with data in fun and creative ways
What if . . . statisticians and journalists worked together to create meaningful, accurate, and truly human-centered data communication?