1 of 12

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

Korematsu v. U.S.

Published on Nov 19, 2015

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

KOREMATSU v. US.

THE COURT CASE INVOLVING JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES
Photo by space_monkey

HOW THIS COURT CASE CAME TO BE!

  • "As long as my record stands in federal court, any American citizen can be held
  • In a prison or concentration camps without trial or hearing. I would like to see
  • The government admit that they were wrong and do something about it, so this
  • Will never happen again to any American citizen of any race, creed, or color."
  • - Fred Korematsu (1982).
Photo by west.m

WHAT HAPPENED???

  • Okay, so when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, America
  • was fearful of another attack. As a form of security, president
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt signed a executive order that placed Japanese and
  • Japanese American into interment camps. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese
  • American, who had claimed to be Mexican American in order to avoid the camps
Photo by keithpr

WHAT DID KOREMATSU DOOOOO??

  • Fred Korematsu was arrested and accused of violation of the executive
  • order. Korematsu was outraged and said that the President, Congress and military
  • had no power to order relocation and claimed that they were discriminating
  • against him. The Government retaliated, saying the internment camps were
  • necessary. The federal appeals courts sided with the government.
Photo by thisisbossi

CONTINUATION, MAH HOMIES?

  • The case was brought to the Supreme Court and the court also sided with the
  • government, saying the need to protect the country was greater than those of individual
  • rights.
Photo by Dorron

NO GIVING UP!

THE CASE WAS DEBATED SEVERAL TIMES, SEEING AS HOW IT TOUCHED ON A SENSITIVE TOPIC.

HUGO BLACK

  • Justice Hugo Black delivered his opinion to the courts, saying that any member
  • who is not originally of American decent is and will always be "suspect" and must
  • be treated with the highest of security. He argued that the internment camps for
  • the Japanese were not unconstitutional, but simply a necessary precaution.
Photo by RV.AB2C

ROBERT JACKSON

  • Justice Robert Jackson sided with Fred Korematsu in the Supreme Court,
  • observing that there was no internment camps or ill behavior being giving to those
  • Americans who are of German or Italian decent, both of whom America was in a
  • war with at the time. He ruled the treatment if the Japanese Americans to be
  • unconstitutional. Owen Roberts backed Robert up, saying ethnicity shouldn't be looked at
Photo by VCU Libraries

MAJORITY RULED!

FRED KOREMATSU AND MANY OTHER JAPANESE WHERE NOW FREE! HOWEVER....

THE KOREMATSU CASE WORRIED MANY CITIZENS

BECAUSE THE CASED SHOWED HOW BASIC CIVIL RIGHTS CAN BE OVERTURNED BY BIASE AND PREJUDICE
Photo by PeraltaC775

CONGRESS TOOK AWAY THE INTERMENT CAMPS IN THE EARLY 1980'S

  • They also issued a order form, stating that the military no longer have to power
  • to make calls in such ordeals, such as the situation with the interment camps for the Japanese
  • In 1988, Congress issued a formal apology for loss of lives, property and the suffering.
  • There were 60,000 survivors, and in 1989, President Clinton presented Fred Korematsu
  • with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Fred Korematsu's work had paid off, and he was now free