He asserts that to achieve maximum profitability, good labor relations and high productivity, every organization must make optimum use of their human assets.
- Responsibility for achieving the organizational goals is widespread throughout the organizational hierarchy - There is a high level of teamwork, communication, and participation.
- it became possible to quantify the results of the work done in the field of group dynamics. - Likert theory also facilitated the measurement of the “soft” areas of management, such as trust and communication.
PARTICIPANT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - The research focus of this theory is on small groups, yet the findings are applied to the total organization. Liker tans his associates felt the need for clarity in role definitions , but simultaneously suggested, for example, cross-functional teams and matrix departmentalization, which usually INCREASE ROLE CONFLICT and UNCERTAINTY.
HUMAN ASSET ACCOUNTING - Likert has suggested methods for measuring the value of the human assets of an enterprise but it is DIFFICULT TO DO SO. There is little evidence that this has been done with an agreeable degree of credibility. There is conflict among management experts, between the proponents of human resource accounting and the financial people who have to develop the system for measuring the human assets.
MEASURING VARIABLES - While Likert has developed a means of measuring the participative group management under System 4, the measurement is still rather CRUDE, and much more empirical research is needed to verify its utility.