1 of 29

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

Martin Buber’s Encounter

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Ich Es & Ich Du of Martin Buber

Photo by Cody Engel

“When two people relate to each other authentically and humanly, God is the electricity that surges between them.”

Buber is famous for his thesis of dialogical existence, as he described in the book I and Thou.

Photo by Life Pilgrim

his work dealt with a range of issues including religious consciousness, modernity, the concept of evil, ethics, education, and Biblical hermeneutics.

Buber rejected the label of "philosopher" or "theologian", claiming he was not interested in ideas, only personal experience, and could not discuss God, but only relationships to God.

Photo by tuchodi

In I and Thou, Buber introduced his thesis on human existence.

Inspired by Feuerbach's The Essence of Christianity and Kierkegaard's Single One, Buber worked upon the premise of existence as encounter.

Photo by Jon Tyson

He explained this philosophy using the word pairs of Ich-Du and Ich-Es to categorize the modes of consciousness, interaction, and being through which an individual engages with other individuals, inanimate objects, and all reality in general.

Photo by zone41

Theologically, he associated Ich-Du with the Jewish Jesus and Ich-Es with the apostle Paul (formerly Saul of Tarsus, a Jew).

Photo by jakebouma

Philosophically, these word pairs express complex ideas about modes of being—particularly how a person exists and actualizes that existence.

Photo by freddie boy

As Buber argues in I and Thou, a person is at all times engaged with the world in one of these modes.

The generic motif Buber employs to describe the dual modes of being is one of dialogue (Ich-Du) and monologue (Ich-Es).

Photo by Annie Spratt

The concept of communication, particularly language-oriented communication, is used both in describing dialogue/monologue through metaphors and expressing the interpersonal nature of human existence.

Photo by cogdogblog

Ich‑Du ("I‑Thou" or "I‑You") is a relationship that stresses the mutual, holistic existence of two beings. It is a concrete encounter, because these beings meet one another in their authentic existence, without any qualification or objectification of one another.

Photo by Tyler Nix

Even imagination and ideas do not play a role in this relation. In an I–Thou encounter, infinity and universality are made actual (rather than being merely concepts).

Photo by Abulic Monkey

Buber stressed that an Ich‑Du relationship lacks any composition (e. g., structure) and communicates no content (e. g., information).

Photo by Daniel Lonn

Despite the fact that Ich‑Du cannot be proven to happen as an event (e. g., it cannot be measured), Buber stressed that it is real and perceivable.

Photo by Jennifer Burk

Common English words used to describe the Ich‑Du relationship include encounter, meeting, dialogue, mutuality, and exchange.

Photo by PetiteAnaiis

One key Ich‑Du relationship Buber identified was that which can exist between a human being and God.

Photo by Tim Marshall

Buber argued that this is the only way in which it is possible to interact with God, and that an Ich‑Du relationship with anything or anyone connects in some way with the eternal relation to God.

Photo by Jamiesrabbits

To create this I–Thou relationship with God, a person has to be open to the idea of such a relationship, but not actively pursue it.

The pursuit of such a relation creates qualities associated with It‑ness, and so would prevent an I‑You relation, limiting it to I‑It.

Photo by DESQie

Buber claims that if we are open to the I–Thou, God eventually comes to us in response to our welcome.

the God Buber describes is completely devoid of qualities, this I–Thou relationship lasts as long as the individual wills it. When the individual finally returns to the I‑It way of relating, this acts as a barrier to deeper relationship and community.

Photo by timchallies

The Ich-Es ("I‑It") relationship is nearly the opposite of Ich‑Du.Whereas in Ich‑Du the two beings encounter one another, in an Ich‑Es relationship the beings do not actually meet.

Photo by Pat Guiney

Instead, the "I" confronts and qualifies an idea, or conceptualization, of the being in its presence and treats that being as an object.

Photo by Gertrud K.

All such objects are considered merely mental representations, created and sustained by the individual mind.

This is based partly on Kant's theory of phenomenon, in that these objects reside in the cognitive agent's mind, existing only as thoughts.

Photo by Jonatan Pie

Therefore, the Ich‑Es relationship is in fact a relationship with oneself; it is not a dialogue, but a monologue.