PRESENTATION OUTLINE
ondansetron use in pregnancy
I do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
I will be discussing
off-label use during this presentation.
objectives
- Overview of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy
- Review of literature
- Methodology
- Results
- Discussion of antiemetic use in pregnanc
objectives
- Overview of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy
- Review of literature
- Methodology
- Results
- Discussion of antiemetic use in pregnancy
objectives
- Overview of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy
- Review of literature
- Methodology
- Results
- Discussion of antiemetic use in pregnancy
nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP)
- Affects 74% of pregnant women
- Decreases quality of life
- Hyperemesis gravidarum affects 1% of pregnant women
- Mechanism is unknown
- Decreases quality of life and productivity
Treatment options
- Pyridoxine, doxylamine, or Diclegis (delayed-release doxylamine and pyridoxine)
- Metoclopramide
- Diphenhydramine
- Ondansetron
- Promethazine
- Dimenhydrinate
Use
- Madjunkova et al (2014) reviewed data from Motherisk Helpline in Toronto, Canada
- 42.3% prescribed a medication for NVP
- 55.9% tried ondansetron
- 57.7% tried doxylamine
- Ondansetron and doxylamine were most common combination therapy
Efficacy
- Koren et al (2010) compared effectiveness of a delayed-release doxylamine succinate-pyridoxine hcl tablet to placebo
- Demonstrated a significant increase in NVP symptoms and well-being based on questionnaire answers (P=0.006)
Efficacy
- Oliveira et al (2014) compared ondansetron to doxylamine and pyradoxine using a visual analog scale to rate symptoms
- Use of ondansetron had significantly greater reductions in nausea compared with use of doxylamine and pyridoxine (P=0.019)
safety
- Danish National Birth Registry
- Pasternak et al (2013) found no increased risk with ondansetron use
- Andersen et al (2013) found an increase in congenital heart defects in infants exposed to ondansetron
safety
- National Birth Defects Prevention Study
- Women exposed to ondansetron during pregnancy were 2.37 times more likely to have a baby born with a cleft palate (CI 1.18-7.76)
- Study limitations
RESEARCH QUESTION: How do the prescribing habits of practitioners at WHS reflect the content of the clinic protocol?
Methodology
- Retrospective chart review
- Women with a pregnancy episode and an antiemetic on med list
- January 1, 2013 - May 1, 2014
- 100 total records included
inclusion criteria
- Pregnancy during the study time period
- Use of ondansetron, doxylamine, pyridoxine, delayed-release doxylamine and pyridoxine (Diclegis), metoclopramide, promethazine, and diphenhydramine, dimenhydrinate, meclizine
exclusion criteria
- Antiemetic medication prescribed for a different indication than NVP
- Antiemetic medication prescribed by a provider at another clinic or in the emergency department
Indication
- Delayed-release doxylamine and pyridoxine indicated for NVP
- Ondansetron indicated for prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, radiation and postoperatively, but prescribed off-label widely
safety
- Safety vs efficacy in a gravid population
- Bendectin/Diclectin
- Increased safety data with doxylamine and pyridoxine
efficacy
- High ondansetron use compared to doxylamine and pyridoxine
- 2 patients tried an additional medication after ondansetron
Influencers for increased use
- Provider experience and perception
- Patient experience and perception
- Ease of prescription-writing
- Patient experience and perception
- Self-limiting nature of NVP
convenience
- Ondansetron is easy to write for and obtain
- Pyridoxine comes in multiple strengths
- Unisom product confusion
- Prescription combination product is easier to use but more costly