One art

"tHE aRT OF LOSING ISN'T HARD TO MASTER"

• The author repeats because he wants to show that its very easy to do  
• Also he used end rhyme to make the poem have a rhythm 

"so many things seem filled with the intent"

• The poet used end rhyme by rhyming intent with spent and meant 
• she meant to make the poem more interesting to read

"to be lost that their loss is no disaster"

• That their is an alliteration because the author wants to make it fun
• Also disaster rhymes with master in the 2nd stanza

"i lost two cities, lovely ones. and vaster,"

• This line shows alliteration with lost and lovely
• The alliteration is used to make the poem more fun to read 

stanza 1

• stanza 1 shows that it is very easy to lose things 
• And wont bring disaster with no intent 

stanza 2

• losing stuff will bring a loss in time 
• losing will waste your time 

stanza 3

• Even though you will lose more and more it wont bring disaster
• You can even lose things such as names 

stanza 4

• You could even possably lose somethings big like a "house or city"

stanza 5

• You could lose loved ones and again lose large things

stanza 6

• You may even lose your fans but it wont ever be a disaster

metaphorical

• The poems over all metaphoric meaning all is that its easy to lose things  
• Also that losing couldnt ever be a disaster but will waste time