1 of 9

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

Employment Division v. Smith

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

EMPLOYMENT DIVISION V SMITHI

RESPONDENTS

  • Alfred Leo Smith
  • Galen Black
  • Private drug counselors
  • Fired for peyote use
  • Denied unemployment benefits because firing was for "misconduct"

Untitled Slide

HISTORY OF THE CASE

  • Smith and Black win in state appeals court, Oregon Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court remands case to O.S.C. to determine legality of peyote
  • O.S.C. finds peyote is legal

Can a state deny unemployment benefits to a worker fired for using illegal drugs for religious purposes?

ATTORNEYS

  • David Frohnmayer, Oregon Attorney General
  • Craig Dorsay, specialist in Indian law

RELEVANT CASES

  • Cantwell v Connecticut
  • Wisconsin v Yoder
  • Sherbert v Verner

OPINIONS

  • Majority: Scalia joined by Rehnquist, White, Stevens, and Kennedy
  • Dissent: Blackmun joined by Marshall, Brennan
  • O'Connor sides with majority for different reason

AFTER THE DECISION

  • Religious Freedom Restoration Act
  • Amendments to American Indian Religious Freedom Act
  • Peyote Way Church of God loses claim in district court