Roper V. simmons

"broke into a woman’s home in Missouri, bound her with duct tape, then threw her off a bridge into a river."

In 2002, the Missouri Supreme Court stayed with his execution.

Did they violate the 8th amendment of cruel and unusual punishment by trying to get him executed when he committed a crime at the age of 17?

Supreme Court Argument

Donald P. Roper, Was the prosecutor from Missouri. 1989 decision in Stanford v. Kentucky, which said that executing minors constitutional

Christopher Simmons, Times have changed since 1989 when the Stanford vs Kentucky case happened and many laws have been passed.

petitioner wins children could be executed
respondent wins the child death penalty is officially dead

Did they violate the 8th and 14th amendments of cruel and unusual punishment by trying to execute him when he committed a crime at the age of 17?

2005, in a 5-4 vote they banned the execution of people under the age of 18 when they committed their crimes.

"Words have no meaning if the views of less than 50% Of the death penalty states can Constitute a consensus"
"Everyone in the world has ratified except for the US and Somalia, Contains an Express prohibition of capital punishment 4 crimes committed by juveniles under the age of 18"

"Words have no meaning if the views of less than 50% Of the death penalty states can Constitute a consensus"
"Everyone in the world has ratified except for the US in Somalia, Contains an Express prohibition of capital punishment 4 crimes committed by juveniles under the age of 18"

Bibliography

• "Roper v. Simmons." Oyez, www.oyez.org/cases/2004/03-633. Accessed 20 Mar. 2021.
• Press, Associated. “Roper v. Simmons - Locked Up for Life: Explore: AP.” Associated Press, Associated Press, 1 Nov. 2017, www.ap.org/explore/locked-up-for-life/Roper-v-Simmons.
• “Cruel & Unusual Punishment-Conversation Starter 3- Roper v. Simmons” American Bar Association, www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/programs/constitution_day/conve....