Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
Started in 1975
Helps individuals with disbilities
Ensures that all children with disabilities are entitled to a free appropriate public education to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living.
IDEAS outlines the requirements teachers must meet within their classroom for disabled students. It also improves the education system, (hopefully) providing teachers with resources for helping their students.
No student should be excluded or discriminated against due to their sex.
It is important for teachers to know this information to avoid any illegal situations within the classroom. It also helps to equalize pay for male and female educators.
Jacob Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act
Originally passed in 1988
Benefits gifted and talented students
The purpose of the Act is to orchestrate a coordinated program of scientifically based research, demonstration projects, innovative strategies, and similar activities that build and enhance the ability of elementary and secondary schools to meet the special educational needs of gifted and talented students.
Title I — Improving The Academic Achievement Of The Disadvantaged
Started in 1965
Used to help the disadvantaged and guarentee equal educational opportunities to all students
This title guarantees that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on challenging State academic achievement standards and state academic assessments.
This is important for teachers because providing equal opportunities in the classroom should be a main priority. Knowing this title should effect a teacher's curriculum, making it appeal to all of the students, and also identifying those who need extra help.
The title also effects teachers because it is one of the main reasons for PD.
The cases goal was to make schools provide basic English instruction, or enact some other form of education for students who could not speak English at the time of enrollment
Though the case was appealed multiple times, the final decision of the Supreme Court found in favor of Lau (the students)
The Court claimed that even though the school districts provided equal treatment for all students, it still imposed disparate impact on the non-English speaking students since they were not able to understand the class material as effectively as other students and therefore were deprived of having "meaningful" education.
Teachers need to understand their duty in regards to ESL students
This case is an example of how discrimination in the classroom can turn into a lawsuit against the administration. Teachers need to be aware so they do not end up in a similar situation