1 of 9

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

McCullen V Coakley

Published on Dec 04, 2015

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

MCCULLEN V COAKLEY

BY RICK GLOVER

A Massachusetts law which makes it a crime to stand on a public road or sidewalk within thirty-five feet of a reproductive health care facility violates the First Amendment.


Argued January 15, 2014
Decided June 26, 2014


Chief Justice
John G. Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan

Majority: Roberts, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan

Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court:
"Although respond­ents claim that Massachusetts 'tried other laws already on the books', they identify not a single prosecu­tion brought under those laws within at least the last 17 years. And while they also claim that the Commonwealth 'tried injunctions', the last injunctions they cite date to the 1990s. In short, the Commonwealth has not shown that it seriously undertook to address the problem with less intrusive tools readily available to it. Nor has it shown that it considered different methods that other jurisdic­tions have found effective."

Concurrence :Scalia, joined by Kennedy, Thomas,
Alito


Associate Justice Samuel Alito also filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, stating that the law blatantly discriminates based on viewpoint. He noted that while anti-abortion supporters criticizing the clinic may not enter the zone, clinic counselors or other employees may do so, giving them opportunities to talk to prospective clients.

The Act was challenged under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.