John 14:27 "Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your heart be troubled and do not be afraid."
How can people viewing a website determine if it is a quality product? How does one differentiate between a Wikipedia-like site and a site presented by the U.S. government?
Many students rely on website suffixes such as .gov, .org, and so on to determine the value of a website. Surprisingly, not all can be decided simply by the website suffix.
Many students rely on website suffixes such as .gov, .org, and so on to determine the value of a website. Not all can be decided simply by the website suffix
making a judgment or assessment about the value of a document or website using clearly defined and explained criteria along with evidence from the text
Website or document also can be a product or service
Solid website or document that has been vetted for research purposes is much more valued than one that has gone without a review or, worse yet, has been rated poorly
Everyone has consulted a review at some point, or perhaps even posted one on a website
After viewing a movie, the viewer may have a strong opinion about the mediocre plot twist at the end and feel justified giving his or her opinion about the movie to friends and family
Personal reviews from friends and family about the new Italian restaurant in town to academic reviews of journal articles and books, reviews are something upon which everyone relies
Doctors’ quality of care, the best handyman in town, the worst car-repair shop all of these evaluations are passed around from friend to friend or online
Generally of books in a specific field of study, are used to help evaluate new work or knowledge.
evaluates its worth in the field. It answers inherent questions such as the following: -Does it contribute to the scope of knowledge in the field of study?
-Does it bring up a new point that -previously has not been discussed?
-Who is the audience for this book?
Help viewers evaluate a website or document by giving them guidelines by which to understand whether the material contained in the website or document is of value
Using a website or document that is of value and not biased or outdated, among other criteria helps with learning and utilizing the best information available
Refers to the qualifications of the website or document
Who authored the website?
Can the author be contacted?
Does the person/people who wrote the website have the proper credibility to write about this topic?
Who is the publisher, and is it different from the webmaster (the person who organized and/or maintains the site)?
What is the website’s URL domain extension (e.g., .com, .gov, .org)?
What institution publishes it?
Are the publisher’s qualifications listed?
Refers not only to the goals and objectives of the site or document, but also to whether or not it is biased
What goals and objectives does this product meet? Is the information given in detail? Does the author put forth any opinions, or is the website a cover for a lot of advertising, either a product or a certain viewpoint?
When was the content on the website written and put on the Web? Has it been updated, and if so, when?
Are the links live or are they dead links that lead to nothing?
Do the provided links match the content of the page and are they evaluated as well?
Is the amount of text balanced with the amount of images?
Are there correct citations given for the information presented on the page? (Grand Canyon University, n.d.)
1. Think of the worst movie you have ever seen. 2. Name the genre of movie (some choices are film noir, romance, action, adventure, horror, and comedy) 3. List a minimum of five common elements of that type of movie. Ex. of one of those elements might be that a comedic movie should elicit laughs. 4. Go through your list, and cross out the elements that the worst movie did not include. Ex. your comedy movie may not have made anyone in the theater laugh. 5. How many of the common elements did your movie miss? Do you think this had anything to do with making it an unenjoyable movie? Formulate a response in 100-150 words that discusses how missing or including those elements made the movie a poor one.