PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Clarifying Insurance for auditors of the
R2 Certification Standard
What does the standard say?
- Provision 11 General Principle states that a recycler must have insurance that is "adequate to cover potential risks and liabilities."
Issues with interpretation
- Who defines "adequate"
- How is this idea affected by the TPE?
- What operations require specialty cover?
- Who assesses the potential risks?
Requirement (a) reads that a recycler must have "adequate insurance...to cover liabilities including environmental pollution."
Back to the most basic insurance issue, which is the Total Pollution Exclusion or "TPE"
"Pollutants" include "waste" meaning:
- Items to be recycled
- Items to be recclaimed
- Items to be refurbished
- Items that have been recycled, reclaimed or refurbished
there will be no coverage
- For Bodily Injury or Property Damage from site based operations or from products that left the facility
- The TPE exists in various insurance policies, like E&O, Transportation, Excess liability (umbrella) and General Liability
The TPE
Effectively NEGATES cover
for the ewaste industry
Comment 11.1
- thorough risk assessment
- may be determined that pollution liability is not necessary
COMMENT 11.2
- what does CGL cover?
- what insurance is needed?
- problems with AI status
- dont verify language
Comment 11.3
- what does not admitted mean? It is absolutely regulated.
- lets define NODS
- transportation pollution
- Does it protect both up and down stream?
COMMENT 11.4
- Include products and completed operations if part of Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL)
- "indemnification obligations"
- bad example?
A few parting thoughts about closure and comment 11.5
To be Clear: The current Standard does NOT accept insurance as a means of financial assurance for closure.
BUT Stay Tuned...
COMMENT 11.5
- why outside of insurance?
- trust during BK
- bond backed by personal guarantee
- LOC impairs capital
- Assets in BK