Terms for CM perspective
- Multicultural
- Cross-cultural
- Intercultural
- Pitfalls
In dealing with musics across cultures we are immediately confronted by a confusion of similar terms with different meanings. Music and cultural vocabulary has been further confused by the adoption of terms from the world of retail sales.
Take for instance the term "world music". Like many terms used today, it doesn't mean what is implies. World music was adopted from the music industry attempting to categorize musics for retail consumption. Music was sold under label of "classical" to mean orchestral, vocal, and instrumental musics in the Western European classical tradition, popular, rock, jazz, and other forms . .
Anything else was identified by a region such as "Africa" or "Asian" or "China" and designated as world music.
This is looking at the music of world from a strictly Western viewpoint, where anything that is not "normal" is considered "other." Anything "other" was thrown into world music. . implying that those musics were other or different.
CM attempts to opne up this limited perspective seeing music through its interrelationships.
What are the relationships of musics from several cultures with one another?
1) Multicultural -- refers to many existing in parallel with no real attempt at dialogue, blending, (this happens at multicultural festivals)
2) Cross - Cultural -- can be thought of as one, usually dominant, culture reaching out (think symphony outreach) to another, less dominant. . also the reverse. . a non dominant culture reaching out to dominant. (ex. symphony orchestra outreach . . take Beethoven to the masses or including an Iranian singer on stage with the symphony)
3) Intercultural music making refers to a sort of equal footing, sharing , blending and attempt at dialogue. Think Chieftans and a Chinese music ensemble.
It is #3 in which this study is most interested.