SITE-BASED MANAGEMENT
With that being said, it is worth noting advantages of our second option, that of the site-based management. First and most obvious, is that each site will handle their materials from conception/need to use by students and staff. This in itself can be a strong advantage. We know what we need and take care of it from here. According to Lucile Morsch (1953), "The cataloging can be done without the expense, hazards, and delay of sending the books to the central agency." Again, similar to the phrase, we take care of our own. With this she also stated (1953), "The major financial burden for the participating institutions is included in their salary budgets and thus to some extent more subject to local control."
Although, there are obvious advantages to the site based management system, there are some disadvantages. For instance, if we are cataloging our own resources, that will take time out of the library media specialists day to work on this organizational activity. It may be difficult to fit other activities such as technology specialist and instructional partnerships into the day. This brings to light the question, "will additional site staff will be needed?" Will there need to be additional staff for library operation so that the library media specialist can continue with other responsibilities as well? M orsch (1953) also pointed out that, "A wholesome, critical attitude toward the end product results only from the effort of many cataloging establishments in applying the same rules and following the same policies." If this effort is not made, the cataloging systems may not be the same which could cause problems when participating in any kind of interlibrary loan.