1 of 8

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

Stats Final

Published on Mar 23, 2016

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

INTOXICATION AND COORDINATION

BY: SHOILEE, EMMY, MURPHY AND HANNAH

RESEARCH

  • Drinking causes confusion, vision distortion, double vision, and weakens depth perseption
  • Consumption affects the brain by weaking connections between vision and movement areas
  • Increases effects of gaba in the brain, causes slurred speech and sluggish movements
  • Weakens the muscles of the eye, therefore decreasing hand-eye coordination

PROCEDURE

  • Got a large enough sample: PE & Health Class
  • Randomly selected to catch a ball w/ & w/o goggles
  • Underhand threw a ball from 20 feet back at the students chest
  • Recorded if they caught the ball or not both times
  • Ran the test

DOES ALCOHOL AFFECT YOUR COORDINATION TO CATCH A BALL?

  • To bring awareness to the affect of alcohol on everyday activities
  • Ho: There's no difference between catching a ball without goggles and with goggles
  • Ha: There's a difference between catching a ball without goggles and with goggles
  • We expected to find that people wouldn't be able to catch the ball with goggles as easily.

CONDITIONS

  • The students were randomly selected
  • The sample was independent
  • 19 students are less than 10% of the whole student body
  • Success/Fail condition (next slide)

SUCCESS/FAIL CONDITION

  • Goggles: np (190) is greater than or equal to 10
  • nq (171) is greater than or equal to 10
  • No goggles: np (304) is greater than equal to 10
  • nq (57) is greater than or equal to 10
  • All conditions are met therefore, a normal distribution & 2-prop z test is app.

RUNNING THE TEST

  • Z= -2.0939
  • P-Value: 0.0181
  • 0.0181
  • Reject Ho

CONCLUSION

  • At the 0.05 level of significance, there is convincing evidence that there is
  • a difference between catching a ball without goggles and with
  • goggles.