Embrace Paradox
We have already had a number of encounters with the paradoxical nature of daoist philosophy (see Less Is More and Solve for Pattern). Here is another passage from the Laozi Daodejing (Ames & Hall, 2003, ch. 45, p. 147) that highlights the paradoxical nature of this world:
What is most consummate seems defective,
Yet using it does not wear it out.
What is fullest seems empty,
Yet using it does not use it up.
What is truest seems crooked;
What is most skillful seems bungling;
What is most prosperous seems wanting.
What is most eloquent seems halting.
Staying active beats the cold,
Keeping still beats the heat.
Purity and stillness can bring proper
order to the world.
Paradox is symbolized by the taiji symbol, shown on this slide: Yin (night, female, empty, retreating) and yang (day, male, full, advancing) may be opposites, but they are also joined in an eternal dance (see also Flemons, 1981). Paradox also appears in the Sunzi Bingfa (Minford, 2002) as five dialectical pairs: form (xing) and energy (shi), empty (xu) and full (shi), direct (zheng) and indirect (qi), crooked (yu) and straight (zhi). The paradoxical nature of daoist philosophy gives it tremendous creative potential, especially when dealing with the subtle dynamics of complex situations.