1 of 17

Slide Notes

systematic approach to assess prospective work competencies
DownloadGo Live

Types of Personnel Tests

Published on Nov 18, 2015

A cursory look at personnel tests

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Personnel Tests

systematic approach to assess prospective work competencies
Photo by Samuraijohnny

Employee SCreening

  • Performance Depends on Subordinates
  • Screen out undesirables
  • Limit Costs
"As expected preentry knowledge was positively related to task mastery, role clarity, work group integration, and political knowledge"
Kammeyer-Muller and Wanberg, 789

Limit turnover
Photo by Cubosh

PErson job fit

Main Aim of Personnel Tests
Matching knowledge, skills, abilities (KSAs) and competencies of the job (from a job analysis) to the employee's knowledge, skills, abilities, and competencies.

Use as a supplement.

Research suggests better at revealing candidates that will fail than succeed.
Photo by AhmadHashim

Criteria

  • Reliability and Validity
  • Legal Implications
  • Utility and Costs
  • Applicant Reactions

Adverse Impact- EEOC
Cost efficient

Photo by USACE HQ

Validity and reliabilty

Basic Measures of a Good Test
Reliability is the tests consistency with same candidate.
Criterion, Content, Construct validity.
Criterion validity measures the correlation between the test and job performance. Content validity demonstrates the assessment shows a measure how well the candidate performs at job tasks. Any assessment can have criterion validity; only certain assessments have content validity (personality, intelligence, integrity tests no appropriate to content validity).
Construct- traits.
Photo by Daniel*1977

LEgal IMplications

From the EEOC.
Basically Prove tests related to success or failure on the job and prove tests do not unfairly discriminate against minority or non minority subgroups
Photo by Scott*

Utility and cost

Does it pay to use the test?
2 utility measures: Hiring success and economic gains.

Photo by Patrick Gage

applicant reaction

Screening process is a two way street; don't turn off prospective candidates.

More favorable:more relevant to job

1) Work Samples, Job Knowledge, Assesment Centers
2) Cognitive Ability,
3) Personality inventories, Integrity tests, biograhpical data inventories

Most Common

Structured Interviews and Biographies
Unstructured interviews not especially useful.

Structure- develope questions to assess KSA of job analysis. Interviewer has to be trained to administer properly, probe for additional information, apply rating criteria accurately and systematically.

Biographical data typically uses questions about education, training, work experience, and interests to predict success on the job.

WOrk SPecific

Job Knowledge and Work Sample
Job Knowledge- basic do you know how to perform this job.

Work Sample- Mirror tasks perform on the job

Don't test skills you will train a person for.
Photo by Greg Marshall

COnstructs

Personality, Ingretiy, Cognitive
Integrity measures attitudes and experiences to honesty, trustowrthiness, dependablity.

Personality tests Conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, openness to experience, emotional stability.

Conscientiousness most useful predictor of performance across different jobs.

Personality

Recent research:
faking on self report test will happen and might not be a bad thing. May be job related or socially adaptive

Corrections for faking do not appear to improve validity

Low validity for predicting overall job performance

Combine personality test with cognitive ability increases validity than either used separately

Customized personality tests clearly related to future work more valid

Personality tests do have a value predicting future work behavior but more research needed.

Physical Assessments

  • Personal Fitness
  • Motor & Physical Assessment
personal fitness NFL combine. Run one mile, life so much weight

Motor and Physical assessment- physical tests job related.
Photo by Scott*

Motor & Physical Assessment

Simulations

Assessments Centers and Situation Judgement 
assessment centers specifically designed to assess interpersonal skills, communication skills, planning and organization. Exercises monitored and judged by experts

Situation Judgement-Camp Training "What would you do if..."
Photo by hjl

THings to remember

  • Importance of Employee Screening
  • Basic Criteria for a Good Test: Reliability, Validity  
  • Three Types of Validity: Criterion, Content, Construct
  • Be aware of legal implications when administering test
  • Identify correct test for correct job analysis
Photo by Leo Reynolds

Untitled Slide

  • Dessler, Gary (2013) A Framework for Human Resource Management. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
  • Kammeyer-Mueller JD; Wanberg CR (2003) Unwrapping the Organizational Entry Process: Disentangling Multiple Antecedents and Their Pathways to Adjustment Journal of Applied Psychology Vol 88 No 5,779-794
  • Morgeson, FP; Campion MA; Dipboye RL; Hollenbeck JR; Murphy K; Schmitt N (2007) Reconsidering the Use of Personality Tests in Personnel Selection Contexts Personnel Psychology Vol 60, 638-729
  • Pulakso, Elaine D. (2005) Selection Assessment Methods: A guide to implementing formal assessments to build a high-quality workplace. Virginia: Society for Human Resource Management.