TEACHERS
GALLERY
PRICING
SIGN IN
TRY ZURU
GET STARTED
Loop
Audio
Interval:
5s
10s
15s
20s
60s
Play
1 of 8
Slide Notes
Download
Go Live
New! Free Haiku Deck for PowerPoint Add-In
United States v. Windsor
Share
Copy
Download
0
148
Published on Nov 20, 2015
No Description
View Outline
MORE DECKS TO EXPLORE
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
1.
UNITED STATES V. WINDSOR
BY MADDIE PALL, JULIA ROGG, JORDAN MELUGIN, AND JESS LEE
Photo by
VinothChandar
2.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
2007 - Windsor and Spyer married in Canada (homosexual couple)
2009 - Spyer died
2010 - filed law suit
Photo by
VinothChandar
3.
FACTS OF THE CASE
Windsor left Spyer's estate
Windsor denied tax exempt on Spyer's estate in 2009
Photo by
VinothChandar
4.
CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION
Is the decision to deny the tax exempt to Windsor due to the fact that the word "spouse" doesn't apply to same-sex marriages constitutional?
Photo by
VinothChandar
5.
COURT RULE
2010 - Windsor filed law suit
2013 - Windsor refunded $363,053.
Photo by
VinothChandar
6.
JUSTIFICATION
Court used section 3 of DOMA, Defense of Marriage Act
Windsor won because it violated equal protection
Photo by
VinothChandar
7.
MAJORITY OPINION
Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional
The majority of people would rule that it was also unconstitutional
Photo by
VinothChandar
8.
MINORITY
The minority opinion is that it is constitutional to deny her tax exempt
Photo by
VinothChandar
Barrett Pannell
×
Error!