1 of 8

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

United States v. Windsor

Published on Nov 20, 2015

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

UNITED STATES V. WINDSOR

BY MADDIE PALL, JULIA ROGG, JORDAN MELUGIN, AND JESS LEE
Photo by VinothChandar

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

  • 2007 - Windsor and Spyer married in Canada (homosexual couple)
  • 2009 - Spyer died
  • 2010 - filed law suit
Photo by VinothChandar

FACTS OF THE CASE

  • Windsor left Spyer's estate
  • Windsor denied tax exempt on Spyer's estate in 2009
Photo by VinothChandar

CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION

  • Is the decision to deny the tax exempt to Windsor due to the fact that the word "spouse" doesn't apply to same-sex marriages constitutional?
Photo by VinothChandar

COURT RULE

  • 2010 - Windsor filed law suit
  • 2013 - Windsor refunded $363,053.
Photo by VinothChandar

JUSTIFICATION

  • Court used section 3 of DOMA, Defense of Marriage Act
  • Windsor won because it violated equal protection
Photo by VinothChandar

MAJORITY OPINION

  • Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional
  • The majority of people would rule that it was also unconstitutional
Photo by VinothChandar

MINORITY

  • The minority opinion is that it is constitutional to deny her tax exempt
Photo by VinothChandar