1 of 14

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Act IV, by William Shakespeare Literary Analysis: Conflict in Drama

Published on Apr 17, 2016

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Act IV,
by William Shakespeare

Literary Analysis: Conflict in Drama

A. DIRECTIONS: For each of the following external conflicts, tell what issue the two characters
disagree about. Explain the reasons each character gives for his view.

1. Antony vs. Octavius: Act IV, Scene i, ll. 12–40

1. Issue: whether Lepidus is fit to be one of the three rulers of Rome;

Antony’s view/reasons: Antony feels that Lepidus is too weak and limited to share power with Octavius and himself. He thinks Lepidus is fit only to carry out orders.

Octavius’ view/ reasons: Octavius feels that Lepidus should be respected and rewarded because he has been a valiant soldier in their cause.

2. Brutus vs. Cassius: Act IV,
Scene iii, ll. 7–32

2. Issue: whether Cassius has been taking bribes;

Brutus’ view/reasons: Brutus believes the rumors he has heard that Cassius is a bribe taker. Brutus feels that taking bribes is an activity that betrays the noble purpose of their conspiracy, which was to fight against injustice.

Cassius’ view/reasons: Cassius is outraged that a friend of his would dare to accuse a veteran soldier like himself.

B. DIRECTIONS: Describe the internal conflict Brutus may be feeling in each passage.

1. Act IV,
Scene ii,
ll. 6–27

1. In Act IV, Scene ii, ll. 6–27, Brutus begins to worry that he can no longer trust Cassius and wonders whether he should have participated in the assassination after all.

2. Act IV,
Scene iii, ll. 274–289:

2. In Act IV, Scene iii, ll. 274–289, Brutus’ fearful response to Caesar’s ghost suggests feelings of guilt and remorse for his participation in the assassination. It reinforces his feelings that perhaps the assassination was a big mistake.

Thank You Folks..